IRRC No. 879

Taking care to protect the environment against damage: a meaningless obligation?

Reading time 6 min read
Download PDF
This article is also available in

Little attention is paid to the obligation of 'care' in Article 55(1) of Additional Protocol I. Beyond a general principle of upholding environmental value in times of armed conflict, what is the scope and content of the obligation? If it is worthless, what makes it so? Since the care provision includes the same high threshold of harm found elsewhere in the environmental provisions, has this stumbling block now been removed by state practice? Rule 44 of the Customary Law Study might appear to suggest that this is so, or does it? Ultimately then, is the care obligation worth caring about?

Download PDF

Continue reading #IRRC No. 879

All articles

Taking care to protect the environment against damage: a meaningless obligation? author: Karen Hulme

6 min read

Climate change adaptation: integrating climate science into humanitarian work author: Lisette M. Braman, Pablo Suare, Maarten K. Van Aalst

6 min read

Climate change, natural disasters and displacement: a multi-track approach to filling the protection gaps author: Vikram Kolmannskog, Lisetta Trebbi

6 min read

Collective reparation for victims of armed conflict author: Friedrich Rosenfeld

5 min read

Framework for environmental management in assistance programmes author:

11 min read

Strengthening Legal Protection for Victims of Armed Conflicts author: Jakob Kellenberger

2 min read

The Paul Reuter Prize 2009, Presentation Ceremony, Geneva, 15 July 2010. Recipient: Dr. Théo Boutruche author: Toni Pfanner

1 min read

National implementation of international humanitarian law (Autumn 2010) author:

4 min read

Books and articles (Autumn 2010) author:

2 min read

Go back to the first article